In order for the opposition to make the arguments stand specifically, their defense of public opinion and recognition of pluralism as reasons to reject same-sex marriage, rather than just statements about how awesome diverse mindset and majority perceptions are, they would have had to demonstrate that the opinions of those who wish to be married to whichever gender they wish are less valid, in an absolute sense, than the opinions of the people who wish to stop them.
Accessed on September 25, WestMarch 26,
More importantly, it is ok that these diverse views exists. Toronto StarApril 18, Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh of B.
Afterward, Trump posted on twitter that critical race theory was "a sickness that cannot be allowed to continue. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 March Trump on Twitter".
Even if we were to accept, for sake of argument, that it is a moral truism that homosexuality is acceptable, and same-sex marriage derivatively desirable, the end-goal of persuading those who do not believe these claims, and thereby improving the lot of gay persons, can be massively harmed by a blanket moral demand by the United Nations, or team USA, that same-sex marriage be legalised immediately.
Substantive equality relates to, but is not limited to, all those things proposition has just mentioned — equal treatment from the police, from fellow citizens, and from employers. Our case is simply, in a sense, but critically so, a defence of legal and moral pluralism, and the importance of a gradual realisation of liberalism.